I’ve been doing a weekly planning session for the last five or so years. It is one of the most helpful things I do to organize my life, keep myself physically healthy, and moving forward. This process has become even more valuable to me since having a child, as I am now responsible for a lot more and time is more scarce. In this post, I’ll describe what I do, why it’s useful, and how I do it. ...

This post documents some testing I did around whether unit tests in Golang are run in parallel. TLDR: Tests in a given package run serially, unless t.Parallel() is specified. To test this, I created two files in a directory named gotest: $ ls one_test.go two_test.go // one_test.go package main import ( "fmt" "testing" "time" ) func TestOne(t *testing.T) { fmt.Println("1 starts:", time.Now().String()) time.Sleep(5 * time.Second) fmt.Println("1 ends:", time.Now().String()) } // two_test.go package main import ( "fmt" "testing" "time" ) func TestTwo(t *testing.T) { fmt.Println("2 starts:", time.Now().String()) fmt.Println("2 ends:", time.Now().String()) } When I ran the tests, you can see that TestOne blocked TestTwo from running for five seconds: ...

Thanks to Julia Evan’s latest post, I learned that creating new slices by sub-slicing an existing slice has an important caveat: They can sometimes use the same backing array! 😬 This is important to understand if you mutate the sub-slice. Take the below example, wherein we accidentally mutate s1! package main import ( "fmt" ) func main() { s1 := []int{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} // len == 6, capacity == 6 s2 := s1[1:5] // len == 4, capacity == 5 // Modifies both s1 and s2, because they share the same backing array. s2[0] = 10 // Modifies both s1 and s2, because the length of s2 after adding the new // element does not exceed the capacity of the s2 slice. s2 = append(s2, 20) // Modifies only s2, because adding this element increases the length of s2 // beyond the capacity of the s2 slice. This allocats a new backing array, // copies all elements to it, and then appends 30 to it. So s1 does not get // modified. s2 = append(s2, 30) fmt.Println("s1", s1) fmt.Println("s2", s2) } Its output is: ...

I run Unifi network gear in my house. As I have multiple wireless access points, I use a controller to manage them so clients can seamlessly roam between them. I run Unifi’s controller software as a Docker container (from here and here) to save myself from running Yet Another Appliance™ and paying for more hardware. I’ve been running v6 for a while, but recently upgraded to v8. These are my notes to myself for how I set this up. ...

A coworker turned me onto this lovely technique the other day. You can use a git pre-push hook to run all of your Golang unit tests before pushing. To do this, make a the following file: $YOUR_REPO/.git/hooks/pre-push The file must be executable. The file’s contents should be: #!/bin/sh if ! go test ./... ; then echo echo "Rejecting commit. Unit tests failed." echo exit 1 fi Easy peasy.

I wore Invisalign braces from January of 2022 to early 2023. They require a lot of brushing and maintenance while wearing them. Here’s a few things I did along the way which made that easier. 1. Create brushing stations You’re going to brush and floss a lot. (Like a lot.) Anytime you eat or drink anything besides water you must remove the Invisalign trays, brush your teeth and trays, and then floss. ...

Have you ever been developing on a feature branch and needed to look at a separate branch on the same repo? I have. When this happens, I normally do one of two things: git stash my changes and change branches This is annoying because it’s a lot of steps. I also have to remember which stash to pop when I come back to this branch. Stage all my changes and store them in a work-in-progress commit This is better than #1 but doesn’t let you view both branches simultaneously. But it’s still annoying if you have files you haven’t staged yet and don’t want to stage yet. Both these have drawbacks. For example, they don’t let me look at both branches at the same time in my text editor. ...

Derek Sivers recently wrote a post explaining how he backups his computers. His post inspired me to improve my own backup strategy and also to write this post. My computer I only have two personal computers whose data I care about; my Macbook Pro and my wife’s Macbook Air. The strategies for backing these up are the same, so I’ll just talk about my computer. It has a lot of important things: files, videos, photos, personal code, and more. I’d be pretty sad and set back if I lost all of it. So I’m pretty exhaustive about my backup strategy, but it ends up taking very little of my personal time because most of it happens with little thought on my part. ...

It is often useful to run a subset of the tests in a Go project. You might do this because you only want to see test results for one package or to run tests faster. For these examples, assume your project is a Go module named examplemodule. It has the following structure: examplemodule |_ go.mod |_ go.sum |_ internal |_ foo | |_ foo.go | |_ foo_test.go |_ bar |_ bar.go |_ bar_test.go Here’s the most useful techniques I use to do this: ...

Today I needed to use the maximum unsigned 64-bit integer value possible in Golang. Here is a short program I wrote with some help from Stack Overflow to help me remember how to calculate these without any dependencies. package main import "fmt" const ( minUint32 = uint32(0) maxUint32 = ^uint32(0) minUint64 = uint64(0) maxUint64 = ^uint64(0) minInt32 = int32(-maxInt32 - 1) maxInt32 = int32(maxUint32 >> 1) minInt64 = int64(-maxInt64 - 1) maxInt64 = int64(maxUint64 >> 1) ) func details[numeric int32 | int64 | uint32 | uint64](name string, num numeric) { fmt.Printf("%9s -> dec: %21d\tbin: %65b\n", name, num, num) } func main() { details("minUint32", minUint32) details("maxUint32", maxUint32) details("minUint64", minUint64) details("maxUint64", maxUint64) details("minInt32", minInt32) details("maxInt32", maxInt32) details("minInt64", minInt64) details("maxInt64", maxInt64) } Running that shows: ...